Grad-to-Grad Networking

Grad-to-Grad Networking for Scholars of Organizations, Occupations, and Work

February 14, 2025

12:30-1:30 PM (EST) / 9:30-10:30 AM (PST)

Zoom (registration at tinyurl.com/oownetwork required to receive link)

This virtual event is an opportunity for graduate students who study organizations, occupations, and work to meet peers with similar interests. The event is open to any graduate student with these interests; membership in ASA or the OOW section is not required. 

Research shows that lateral, peer-to-peer relationships are a meaningful resource for people building their careers. We hope this event can be a springboard for further in-person or virtual collaboration, information-sharing, and connection. Who knows? You might make a new friend, meet a new co-author, or just get more comfortable talking to others about your research.

Register to receive the Zoom link at: tinyurl.com/oownetwork. If you have any questions, please contact Ewa Protasiuk (ewa.protasiuk@temple.edu) or Victoria Zhang (vzhang3@mit.edu).

Call for Submissions

2025 ASA Thematic Roundtable on Organizing Informal Workers (Development Section)

Katherine Maich and Chris Tilly are organizing a Thematic Roundtable on Organizing Informal Workers at ASA 2025, as one roundtable within Sociology of Development. Mobilizations of informal workers, those lacking the legal and social insurance protections of standard workers, have become increasingly important, especially as more of the world of work informalizes. What does this mean for the future of work overall? We welcome empirical and theoretical, qualitative and quantitative work from any region of the world. Contributions from PhD students and junior scholars are particularly welcome.

To submit a paper, please do both of the following: (1) submit a paper or extended abstract to the Sociology of Development Roundtables through the regular ASA portal ahead of the February 26 deadline; (2) at the same time, email the paper or abstract to Kate at kmaich@tamu.edu. For any questions, please contact kmaich@tamu.edu.

New Publication

Here is a new publication from our OOW section member:

Wilcox, Annika. 2025. “Conforming Critical Diversity: Voicing Diversity for Equity in an Organizational Inequality Regime.” Sociological Focus 58(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/00380237.2024.2433524

ABSTRACT: Diversity is a contested notion: it can be framed “uncritically,” as all differences that benefit privileged groups, or “critically,” as categorical inequalities that must be addressed to advance equity. While uncritical diversity is broadly legitimated, critical diversity is often socially suppressed, particularly in racialized and gendered workplaces. Prior research elucidates how organizational actors advance uncritical (e.g. colorblind) diversity yet pays little attention to how everyday employees voice critical diversity in white-male-dominated work contexts that politicize matters of inequality. I address this concern via analysis of an extreme case: a large, U.S.-based technology company. Drawing on in-depth interviews with employees, I demonstrate that individuals strategically negotiate critical and uncritical meanings of diversity in conversation by conforming critical diversity, which involves (1) defining diversity broadly yet centering categories of inequality, (2) offering critical and uncritical justifications of diversity, and (3) couching critical justifications in individualistic language. These practices uphold status-quo-reproducing diversity narratives while also generating more critical arguments than expected based on prior research. Results suggest the importance of studying how the interactional spaces of organizations and workplaces constrain and enable individuals’ discussions of diversity. If organizations redefined cultural norms governing diversity-related conversations, they might see greater results from formal diversity initiatives.

Special Issue Call for Papers OOW

Special Issue: The Precarity of Work and Life: How Insecurity Equalizes and Stratifies People’s Experiences

Submission deadline: Tuesday, September 2, 2025

In 2023, an opinion piece in the New York Times posed a question: “why does everyone feel so insecure?” As the article delineates, “insecurity” is frequently described as the defining characteristic of our contemporary lives. However, despite the wide use of this concept in public debates as well as in the social sciences, socio-economic insecurity — and, to a lesser extent, its close cousin, “precarity” — have been subjected to very little theoretical conceptualization and/or dedicated research that seeks to systematize and concretize insecurity as a field of study. Our special issue aims to resolve this absence, with a particular focus on how socio-economic insecurity relates to the maintenance, reconfiguration, or legitimation of inequality.

Insecurity sets up an important puzzle for the social sciences: on the one hand, insecurity is felt by “everybody,” as Astra Taylor suggests in the New York Times, or at least a large and growing portion of the population. On the other, insecurity and precarity are the products of an economy that is increasingly unequal. In order to solve this puzzle, sociologists need to further investigate how experiences of insecurity vary and the ways in which economic and cultural factors shape different varieties of insecurity. We ask: Is everyone really experiencing insecurity? How is insecurity related to people’s structural conditions?

In order to address this puzzle, we welcome articles that address all aspects of socio-economic insecurity that go beyond orthodox economic framings and that can lead to empirical advancements, as well as theoretical developments, in how we understand insecurity vis-à-vis inequality. We invite submissions that use diverse methodological approaches, e.g. that explore subjective experiences of insecurity through in-depth qualitative or ethnographic research, that investigate generalizable or cross-national trends through quantitative data-based analyses, or that engage with mixed methodologies. We are particularly interested in sociological studies that address the following aspects of insecurity:

Topics for this call for papers include but are not restricted to:

·  Research on insecurity that moves beyond a limited conceptualization of insecurity and precarity as primarily related to employment to one that engages with the financial aspects of people’s instability, the relationship between employment and finances, as well as the unequal ways in how people negotiate socioeconomic uncertainty in their lives overall. What are the connections between work precarity and insecurity in livelihoods? How do the manifestations of insecurity differ nationally and globally in various spheres of individuals’ lives (e.g. housing, food consumption, debt and finance)? How is insecurity related to intersectional inequalities pertaining to class, gender, race/ethnicity and sexual identity?

·  Studies that employ an understanding of socio-economic insecurity that goes beyond a purely (macro)economic focus or the use of “objective” economic measures. We aim to deepen the focus on the subjective experiences of insecurity that are often linked to the decline in social status of previously secure social strata (e.g. the squeezed middle classes). What is the relationship between the objective and subjective insecurity experienced by individuals? What is the temporal construction of insecurity and how is present insecurity shaped by past experiences and projections/expectations of future conditions? How does insecurity contribute to redefining class positions and class boundaries? How do increases and decreases in insecurity influence social status threat or social status gains across the globe?

Guest Editors:
Dr. Lorenza Antonucci
University of Birmingham
United Kingdom

Dr. Elena Ayala-Hurtado
Princeton University
United States

Announcement: OOW Book Club on 2/28 & 4/18

All OOW members are invited to participate in an informal, online discussion of Gray and Suri’s Ghost Work on Friday, Feb 28, 12-1pm Eastern Time. The conversation will be “book club style”, with everyone welcome to share ideas. (If you’d like to participate but time is short, focus on chapters 1 & 3.) The book may be available as an e-book from your library, or you can purchase it here.  We hope students and faculty alike come to discuss and meet with fellow OOW members. To register and receive a zoom link, click here.  Questions? Contact Laura Doering (laura.doering@utoronto.ca).


All OOW members are invited to participate in an informal, online discussion of Fourcade and Healy’s The Ordinal Society on Friday, April 18, 12-1pm Eastern Time. The conversation will be “book club style”, with everyone welcome to share ideas. (If you’d like to participate but time is short, focus on the introduction & chapter 1.) The book may be available as an e-book from your library, or you can purchase it here.  We hope students and faculty alike come to discuss and meet with fellow OOW members. To register and receive a zoom link, click here.  Questions? Please contact Laura Doering (laura.doering@utoronto.ca).

SER Cafe: Gender disparities in the workplace on 1/24 

Join us for an engaging SER Café event featuring a thought-provoking discussion with SER authors, Anne-Kathrin KronbergAnna GerlachMarta FanaDavide Villani, and Martina Bisello.

The paper by Kronberg and Gerlach, “Off to a slow start: which workplace policies can limit gender pay gaps across firm tenure?”, explores the pressing issue of how workplace policies impact gender pay gaps over employee tenure. Fana, Villani and Bisello investigate gender gaps in workplace power and control, finding that women face more control than men within the same job, even after accounting for factors like education and seniority in “Gender gaps in power and control within jobs”.

Together, these papers offer compelling insights into the interplay between workplace practices, organizational culture, and policy interventions in perpetuating or mitigating gender inequalities. As workplace equity remains a pivotal issue, these studies provide a deeper understanding of the structural barriers and potential pathways toward closing gender gaps.

The event will take place on Friday, January 24th, at 8AM PST/ 11AM EST/ 5PM CET. Register at this link!

https://northwestern.zoom.us/meeting/register/03fMIgUpRseoMPjBdjX8GA

As with all SER Café events, this session will prioritize dynamic conversation with the authors over lengthy presentations. Come ready to engage, ask questions, and discuss these critical contributions to the field.

New Publication: Organizational constraints on campus support programs: A case for former foster care youth

Dominguez, Rachael & Ueno, Koji. (2025, online first). “Organizational constraints on campus support programs: A case for former foster care youth.” Children and Youth Services Review, 168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.108036

Abstract: Campus support programs provide targeted services to groups of students throughout their time in college. Some institutions have implemented support programs for former foster care youth, who face lower rates of college retention and graduation than their non-foster peers. These programs must operate within the constraints that colleges and universities impose on them while attempting to maintain program effectiveness. Despite the relevance of the broader university context on campus support program effectiveness, limited studies have examined possible implications of organizational constraints. This study explores organizational constraints and their consequences on campus support programs for former foster care youth. Using an integrated organizational sociology of education framework, we analyzed data from in-depth interviews with 20 program coordinators of campus support programs for former foster care youth across the United States. Results revealed five organizational constraints imposed by the organizational network and structure: limited resource allocation, immobilized information, structural disconnection, conflicting goals, and weak relationships. Our analysis suggests these constraints reinforce each other and undermine program effectiveness. We conclude by discussing the need for additional organizational research on campus support programs, arguing that addressing constraints can lead to a more thorough understanding of their consequences on campus support programs for marginalized student groups.

Free Access by January 17: https://authors.elsevier.com/a/1kAvJ_4La8W7-W

CfP: Special Issue on Offshore Finance in Socio-Economic Review

Dear section members,

We’re pleased to share a Call for Papers for a special issue of Socio-Economic Review on the topic of offshore finance. The deadline for first submissions is May 15, 2025.

This special issue will be co-edited by Brooke Harrington (Dartmouth College), Kimberly Kay Hoang (University of Chicago), and Vanessa Ogle (Yale University). For more details about the call and submission guidelines, please visit: https://academic.oup.com/ser/pages/cfp-offshore-finance.

OOW

Job Postings: Tenured Position & PhD Position

  1. Tenured Position at UNC Charlotte

The Department of Sociology at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte is seeking applications for a tenured position as Associate or Full Professor of Sociology (9 month term of appointment) who specializes in advanced data analyses, with an open substantive specialty to begin fall 2025.  

They seek to hire a scholar who can contribute to the Sociology Department and School of Data Science in teaching, research, and service. Requirements for this position include 1) a Ph.D. in Sociology or related field; 2) a strong research agenda that focuses on the use of quantitative methods with big data; 3) a commitment to teaching in a dynamic, access-oriented, urban research university, 4) evidence of teaching experience or preparation for college teaching; and 5) potential to secure external funding. 

Please apply online at https://jobs.charlotte.edu/ (position #007556) and include your curriculum vita, a cover letter, a statement about your teaching, a statement about your research, and contact information for three references. 

  1. PhD Position at emlyon Business School

Dear colleagues,

We are advertising a fully funded 4-year PhD position starting in September 2025 at emlyon Business School, France. We seek a candidate interested in pursuing a PhD focused on organisational, occupational, or work-related issues, with a commitment to ethnographic research. Candidates should possess an MA in Sociology or Anthropology and prior fieldwork experience. The working language is English, but understanding French will be advantageous.

She/he will be part of the OCE Research Center (https://oce.em-lyon.com). OCE is a group of researchers supporting the development of critical qualitative and ethnographic research on organisational issues. They have published their research in journals such as Administrative Science Quarterly, Organizational Research Methods, Academy of Management Review, Organization Science, Organization Studies, Journal of Management Studies, Human Relations, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, and Ethnography.

We will examine applications until the position is filled. Feel free to contact me with any questions at gdumont@em-lyon.com.

Thank you,

Dumont, Associate Professor of Anthropology.
Director, Ethnography Institute
emlyon Business School & OCE Research Center
https://www.guillaumedumont.eu

New Book by Benjamin H. Bradlow

Urban Power: Democracy and Inequality in São Paulo and Johannesburg (Princeton University Press 2024)


For the first time in history, most people live in cities. One in seven are living in slums, the most excluded parts of cities, in which the basics of urban life—including adequate housing, accessible sanitation, and reliable transportation—are largely unavailable. Why are some cities more successful than others in reducing inequalities in the built environment? In Urban Power, Benjamin Bradlow explores this question, examining the effectiveness of urban governance in two “megacities” in young democracies: São Paulo, Brazil, and Johannesburg, South Africa. Both cities came out of periods of authoritarian rule with similarly high inequalities and similar policy priorities to lower them. And yet São Paulo has been far more successful than Johannesburg in improving access to basic urban goods.

Bradlow examines the relationships between local government bureaucracies and urban social movements that have shaped these outcomes. Drawing on sixteen months of fieldwork in both cities, including interviews with informants from government agencies, political leadership, social movements, private developers, bus companies, and water and sanitation companies, Bradlow details the political and professional conflicts between and within movements, governments, private corporations, and political parties. He proposes a bold theoretical approach for a new global urban sociology that focuses on variations in the coordination of local governing power, arguing that the concepts of “embeddedness” and “cohesion” explain processes of change that bridge external social mobilization and the internal coordinating capacity of local government to implement policy changes.

Urban Power: Democracy and Inequality in São Paulo and Johannesburg

You can order it at any of the following links:

Princeton University Press (Save 30% from Princeton University Press with code: P327)

Bookshop.org

Amazon.com