Announcement: Please Join Socio-Economic Review (SER) Café Event on Friday, January 30th, 2026 via Zoom!

Join us for an engaging SER Café event featuring a thought-provoking discussion with recent Socio-Economic Review authors, Tiago Vieira (European University Institute), Pedro Mendonça (Heriot-Watt University), Qi Song (Northwestern University), and Tiantian Liu (The University of Manchester).

The paper published by Tiago Vieira and Pedro Mendonça in 2025, The times, are they changing? Examining platform companies’ chameleonic labour process as a response to the Spanish Rey Rider, Tiago Vieira, Pedro Mendonça investigates the impact of Spain’s Ley Rider (Rider Law), which established a universal presumption of employment for platform couriers by highlighting platform companies as “institutional chameleons,” to underline their ability to adjust their operations to either comply with or circumvent new regulatory frameworks. Qi Song and Tiantian Liu published their study in 2025 called Transcending boundaries and breaking social safety nets: how digital platforms reorganize the market and exacerbate economic insecurity, Qi Song, Tiantian Liu to explore the platformization of the Chinese freight transportation sector, specifically the emergence of the Full Truck Alliance (FTA) by arguing that platforms have replaced traditional “relational infrastructures”—social networks based on trust and local ties—with centralized digital infrastructures.

The event will take place on Friday, January 30th, 2026, 8:00 AM PT / 4:00 PM GMT (UK) / 5:00 PM CET. Please register at this link: https://utexas.zoom.us/meeting/register/yewOixmESU6pA75inJbSeQ

As with all SER Café events, this session will prioritize dynamic conversation with the authors over lengthy presentations. Come ready to engage, ask questions, and discuss these critical contributions to the field. Our authors look forward to your questions and comments.

Team SER Café (Ezgi, Fan, and Kyungmo)

Socio-Economic Review

New Publication: “The Internal Effects of Corporate ‘Tech Ethics’: How Technology Professionals Evaluate Their Employers’ Crises of Moral Legitimacy” by Rachel Y. Kim

Kim, Rachel Y. 2025. “The Internal Effects of Corporate ‘Tech Ethics’: How Technology Professionals Evaluate Their Employers’ Crises of Moral Legitimacy.” Socio-Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwaf043

Abstract: Big Tech firms use “tech ethics” to regain public trust and influence employees’ moral evaluations of their firms and their work. Unlike traditional professions, technology professionals lack institutionalized professional ethics. Consequently, corporate “tech ethics” serve as a primary source of formal ethical guidance. Analyzing thirty-two interviews with technology professionals employed at US-based Big Tech firms, this study demonstrates that respondents’ perceptions of the effectiveness of corporate “tech ethics” closely align with how they evaluate their firms’ crises and the ethicality of their own work. Those who trusted “tech ethics” tended to believe that their companies had adequately addressed their crises and defended their work as following rigorous ethical standards, while those who were doubtful or distrusting reported greater moral unease and professional disillusionment. By highlighting the effects of organizational legitimization strategies, this study contributes to research on the role of moral perceptions in professional employees’ work experiences and career trajectories.

Rachel Y. Kim is a Ph.D. student in Sociology at Harvard University. Her research interests include economic sociology, cultural sociology, the sociology of work and professions, science and technology studies, and qualitative methods. She is particularly interested in how professionals in the tech industry, especially in Silicon Valley, navigate issues of expertise, innovation, and moral legitimacy in the context of corporate ethics.

Rachel holds a B.A. in Sociology with Honors from the University of Chicago (2019). Before graduate school, she worked as a project coordinator at Loevy & Loevy, a civil rights law firm in Chicago.

Call for Papers: Special Issue of Socio-Economic Review

Call for PapersContesting Markets: How Organizations and Social Movements Shape the Political Economy

Special Issue of Socio-Economic Review

Guest Editors:
Neil Fligstein (University of California-Berkeley)
Doug McAdam (Stanford University)

Timeline:
Submission deadline: September 1, 2017
Publication of the special issue in the Socio-Economic Review: 2019

Background
For the past 20 years, scholars of social movements and those who study corporations have been in dialogue. We have witnessed a vibrant exchange about how social movements challenge firms to change their strategies, create the conditions to support new industries, and explain the emergence of new markets as reflecting social movement like processes. For example, social movements have successfully altered the tactics of firms in the apparel and forest product industries (Bartley, 2003) and in biotechnology (Weber, Rao, and Thomas, 2009; for a review see King and Pearce, 2010). They have led to the legitimation of new industries like hospice care (Livne, 2014) and the market for insurance viaticals (Quinn, 2008).  Scholars interested in the process of market emergence and change have viewed market formation processes as akin to social movements as they require the creation of new products, new firms, new identities, and political solutions to market contentiousness (Haveman, Rao, and Thomas, 2007; Lounsbury, Ventrusca, and Hirsch, 2003).  Fligstein and McAdam (2012) have proposed a more general theory of social spaces that explain why these different kinds of links exist between social movements and market fields.

Continue reading “Call for Papers: Special Issue of Socio-Economic Review”