Announcement: Join the Socio-Economic Review (SER) Café Event on May 26, 2026, via Zoom

Join us for the next SER Café event on the theme “Financialization and the Reproduction of Inequality.” This one-hour Zoom session will feature a discussion with recent Socio-Economic Review authors Angelina Grigoryeva (University of Toronto), and Bruno Bonizzi (City St George’s, University of London).

In her 2025 article “The shift to stock-based compensation and gender inequality in wealth in the United States”, Angelina Grigoryeva uses Survey of Consumer Finances data to show that stock-based compensation, though a more powerful vehicle for wealth accumulation than regular wages, disproportionately benefits men—especially at the top of the wealth distributions.

The second article “Pension financialization and workplace pension wealth inequality: evidence from Britain” by Bruno Bonizzi, Hulya Dagdeviren, and Benjamin Tippet, examines how the shift from Defined Benefit to Defined Contribution pensions has reshaped pension wealth inequality in Britain. They identify four key channels through which DC pensions aggravate inequality—the inequality of pension contributions, lack of redistributive mechanisms, the compounding effects of missed contributions, and unequal capacity for financial risk. Bruno Bonizzi will join the discussion to represent the author team.

The event will take place on May 26, 2026 (Tuesday) at 10:00 AM PT / 12:00 PM CT / 1:00 PM ET / 6:00 PM UK time.
Please register at this link

As with all SER Café events, this session will prioritize dynamic conversation with the authors over lengthy presentations. Come ready to engage, ask questions, and discuss. Our authors look forward to your questions and comments.

Team SER Café (Ezgi, Fan, and Kyungmo)
Socio-Economic Review

New Publication: “Workplace Productivity: Gender, Parenthood, and Career Consequences in the United States”

Yavorsky, Jill, Yue Qian, and Rebecca Glauber. 2025. “Workplace Productivity: Gender, Parenthood, and Career Consequences in the United States.” Gender, Work & Organization 1–21. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gwao.70027

Main Findings: Using a novel survey experiment fielded among 975 US managers, we find that managers more severely penalize mothers, compared to fathers, when their job productivity decreases due to childcare issues outside their control. This result was primarily driven by men managers who gave fathers a greater benefit of the doubt when it came to their decreased productivity. 

Abstract: Many dual-earner parents face ongoing challenges to securing reliable and accessible childcare, which potentially affect their productivity at work and consequential career rewards. Although productivity can ebb and flow, limited research has examined how productivity changes influence parents’ access to organizational rewards, especially when productivity changes result from childcare issues outside their control. The answer to this question is crucial for understanding gender inequality given that childcare issues are more likely to affect mothers’ productivity and employers could enact gender biases toward mothers (or fathers) when their productivity changes. Using a novel survey experiment fielded among 975 US managers, we assessed how a parent’s productivity changes (because of childcare issues outside their control) influenced managers’ recommendations of future organizational rewards (pay, promotions, etc.) to the parent. First, we find that managers assigned lower career rewards to workers whose productivity decreased, relative to workers whose productivity increased or stayed constant. Second, managers more severely penalized mothers, compared to fathers, when their productivity decreased. Third, exploratory analyses suggested that the widened gender gap in career rewards among parents whose productivity decreased was driven by men managers who penalized fathers less than women managers, primarily because men managers did not view fathers’ decreased productivity as evidence of reduced competence, professional commitment, or interest in advancement. By revealing pro-male biases that help explain the greater penalties faced by mothers relative to fathers when their productivity declined, our findings expose potential long-lasting impacts of parents experiencing disruptions to childcare on gender inequality in the workplace.

Authors:

Jill Yavorsky is an Associate Professor of Sociology and Organizational Science at the University of North Carolina-Charlotte.

Yue Qian is a Professor of Sociology at the University of British Columbia.

Rebecca Glauber is a Professor of Sociology at the University of New Hampshire.


Job Posting: TT Position at Elmhurst College

Elmhurst College invites applications for a tenure-track assistant professor in Sociology with focus in gender, inequality, and/or social work. Secondary areas in human services, youth populations, special needs populations, and/or families is a plus. The new faculty member will also contribute to the social work program and coordinate student internships. Main teaching responsibilities include Sex and Gender, Social Inequality, the half-credit Capstone Seminar, and other courses based on interest and expertise.  The teaching load is six full-credit courses per year.

Minimum Qualifications:
Evidence of outstanding teaching or teaching potential is essential. Candidates should have a commitment to creating inclusive learning environments for a diverse student body. A PhD in Sociology or closely related field is required by September 1, 2018.
Continue reading “Job Posting: TT Position at Elmhurst College”

New Book: Nemoto on Gender Inequality in the Japanese Workplace

Section member, Kumiko Nemoto, recently published a new book: Too Few Women at the Top: The Persistence of Inequality in Japan (ILR/Cornell University Press, 2016)

Abstract

The number of women in positions of power and authority in Japanese companies has remained small despite the increase in the number of educated women and the passage of legislation on gender equality. In Too Few Women at the Top, Kumiko Nemoto draws on theoretical insights regarding Japan’s coordinated capitalism and institutional stasis to challenge claims that the surge in women’s education and employment will logically lead to the decline of gender inequality and eventually improve women’s status in the Japanese workplace.

Continue reading “New Book: Nemoto on Gender Inequality in the Japanese Workplace”