ILR Review: CALL FOR PAPERS

ILR Review: CALL FOR PAPERS

A Conference and Special Issue Honoring David B. Lipsky

Conflict and Its Resolution in the Changing World of Work

The ILR Review (http://ilr.sagepub.com) invites submissions for a conference and subsequent special issue devoted to the role that conflict and conflict resolution play in the changing world of work. Ariel Avgar (University of Illinois; avgar@illinois.edu), Alexander Colvin (Cornell University; ajc22@cornell.edu), and Harry Katz (Cornell University; hck2@cornell.edu) will serve as coordinators of this special issue. Scholars interested in participating should submit a complete draft of their paper by April 15, 2017. Authors will be notified by July 1, 2017, if their paper has been accepted for presentation at the conference. Prospective contributors are urged to consult any of the coordinators regarding preliminary proposals or ideas for papers.

Authors whose papers are accepted will be invited to a conference sponsored by the ILR School at Cornell University honoring David B. Lipsky and recognizing his many contributions to the field of conflict resolution. The conference will be held in Ithaca, New York, in November 2017. Conference expenses will be subsidized by Cornell University. Papers presented at the conference should be suitable for immediate submission to external reviewers. A subset of authors will be asked to submit their papers to the ILR Review with the expectation that their papers will be published in a special issue if they pass the external review process. Papers that are deemed of good quality but not selected for the special issue may be considered for publication in a regular issue of the journal.

Conflict and its resolution play a pivotal role in the workplace and organizations and help to explain a range of important outcomes at different levels of analysis. While conflict is an inherent part of the workplace and organizational life, the past 40 years have seen a dramatic and consequential transformation in the way it is resolved and managed. In the workplace arena, individual employment rights disputes have supplanted collective bargaining as the most widespread mode of conflict resolution, with declining unionization and strike rates and rising litigation numbers. At the same time, a growing proportion of organizations have turned to alternative methods for dealing with conflict, such as mediation and arbitration that, among other things, are designed to bypass approaches that rely primarily on traditional litigation or managerial authority. New organizational structures and work practices have changed the very nature of conflict and require new and innovative conflict management approaches.

This changing landscape has given rise to important questions about the antecedents and consequences associated with new forms of conflict and the wide array of methods used to manage and resolve it. While scholars in a variety of disciplines have begun to address these questions, there is much more we need to know. Research on alternative conflict resolution methods, for example, has focused more on explaining how and why such methods have emerged and much less on how they affect employees, organizations, and society more generally. In addition, existing studies have primarily focused on conflict resolution in the context of traditional employment arrangements, with far less attention paid to new forms of work and employment models. Existing research has also focused heavily on conflict resolution in the United States, with less attention given to international and comparative perspectives.

The study of conflict and its resolution has been fragmented, with little integration of theoretical and empirical insights across disciplines. Research examining conflict and its resolution at the individual or group levels, for example, does not incorporate relevant findings from organizational and societal level studies, and vice versa. Our theories need to integrate an understanding of how factors at multiple levels of analysis affect conflict, alternative approaches to conflict resolution, and related outcomes.

For this conference and special issue, we are particularly interested in papers that address underexplored areas of research and that incorporate diverse disciplinary perspectives. We welcome papers that are empirical or conceptual; that include international perspectives; and that make use of a range of methodologies, including surveys, experiments, case studies, archival studies, or legal research.

Potential topic areas include, but are not limited to:

  • New and emerging conflict resolution techniques in union and nonunion settings
  • Conflict and conflict resolution practices in different national settings and their implications for theory in this area
  • The relationship between alternative work arrangements and workplace conflict and conflict management
  • The influence of new employment models on conflict and conflict resolution
  • The adoption of conflict resolution practices in small and entrepreneurial firms
  • The link between conflict resolution methods and the level and nature of conflict in organizations
  • The impact of conflict resolution practices on employee, group, organizational, and societal outcomes
  • The implications of internal conflict resolution practices for employee access to justice
  • The relationship between legal, economic, and competitive pressures and workplace conflict and its resolution
  • Explaining individual usage patterns of various conflict resolution practices
  • Advances in the field of negotiation

To submit a paper for consideration, please go to http://ilr.sagepub.com and click on “Submit a Manuscript.” After you have logged into the manuscript submission website, be sure to fill in the “Special Issue” option.

Call for Nominations: 2016 Betty and Alfred McClung Lee Book Award

The Association for Humanist Sociology is pleased to announce their 2016 Betty and Alfred McClung Lee Book Award. Authors, publishers, and AHS members may nominate books for consideration. The winner will be recognized at the annual meeting November 2-6, 2016 in Denver, CO. Nominations should be for Sociology or interdisciplinary social science books that approach their subjects from a humanist perspective.

Continue reading “Call for Nominations: 2016 Betty and Alfred McClung Lee Book Award”

New Publication: The SAGE Handbook of the Sociology of Work and Employment

Picture1

The SAGE Handbook of the Sociology of Work and Employment, edited by Stephen Edgell, Heidi Gottfried, and Edward Granter. Sage. 2015.

The SAGE Handbook of the Sociology of Work and Employment is a landmark collection of original contributions by leading specialists from around the world.

The coverage is both comprehensive and comparative (in terms of time and space) and each ‘state of the art’ chapter provides a critical review of the literature combined with some thoughts on the direction of research. This authoritative text is structured around six core themes:

  • Historical Context and Social Divisions
  • The Experience of Work
  • The Organization of Work
  • Nonstandard Work and Employment
  • Work and Life beyond Employment
  • Globalization and the Future of Work.

Continue reading “New Publication: The SAGE Handbook of the Sociology of Work and Employment”

New Member Publication: Pekarek and Gahan on Strategic Innovation in Australian Unions

OOW member, Andreas Pekarek, recently published (with Peter Gahan) a piece on The Conversation website.  The piece features informed analysis and commentary on Strategic Innovation in Australian Unions.

The details and a link to the article can be found below:

Andreas Pekarek and Peter Gahan. 2016.  “How unions are changing in a bid for relevance – and survival”.  The Conversation.   URL:  https://theconversation.com/how-unions-are-changing-in-a-bid-for-relevance-and-survival-56360

 

The 2016 Summer Institute In Political Psychology (SIPP)

Applications are being accepted now for the 22th Annual Summer Institute in Political Psychology, to be held at Stanford University August 1-19, 2016.

The Summer Institute offers 3 weeks of intensive training in political psychology. Political psychology is an exciting and thriving field that explores the origins of political behavior and the causes of political events, with a special focus on the psychological mechanisms at work. Research findings in political psychology advance basic theories of politics and are an important basis for political decision-making in practice.

SIPP was founded in 1991 at Ohio State University, and Stanford has hosted SIPP since 2005, with support from Stanford University and from the National Science Foundation. Hundreds of participants have attended SIPP during these years.

The 2016 SIPP curriculum is designed to (1) provide broad exposure to theories, empirical findings, and research traditions; (2) illustrate successful cross-disciplinary research and integration; (3) enhance methodological pluralism; and (4) strengthen networks among scholars from around the world.

Continue reading “The 2016 Summer Institute In Political Psychology (SIPP)”

Work in Progress blog now co-sponsored by four Sections: OOW, Econ Soc, LLM & IPM

The Work in Progress editorial team is delighted to announce that it has expanded into a joint project co-sponsored by the following four kindred ASA sections:

  • Organizations, Occupations and Work
  • Economic Sociology
  • Labor and Labor Movements
  • Inequality, Poverty and Mobility.

 Work in Progress is a public sociology blog intended to disseminate sociological research and findings to the general public, with a particular emphasis on contributing to policy debates. After considering a number of names intended to strike a balance between covering the breadth of focus of the four sections while not overloading on specific terms, the editorial team decided on the following:

Continue reading “Work in Progress blog now co-sponsored by four Sections: OOW, Econ Soc, LLM & IPM”

Meet Your Council: Elizabeth Hirsh

cropped-HirshElizabeth Hirsh is currently serving on the OOW Section Council.  Hirsh is Associate Professor of Sociology, Canada Research Chair in Inequality and Law, and Director of Graduate Studies in Sociology at the University of British Columbia.  Before joining the faculty at the University of British Columbia, she completed her PhD in Sociology at the University of Washington in 2006 and taught at Cornell University for four years.

Hirsh’s research expertise is in the areas of organizations, inequality, and the law.  Much of her work focuses on employment discrimination and the impact of antidiscrimination laws and corporate diversity policies on gender, race, and ethnic inequality in the workplace.  Hirsh’s work has appeared in top journals in sociology and law, including the American Sociological Review, the American Journal of Sociology, and the Law and Society Review. Hirsh teaches courses on work organizations, law, and social statistics.

Current projects include: a study of the economic, political, and organizational conditions under which employment discrimination lawsuits filed under U.S. civil rights laws bring about change in sex and race inequality in the workplace; a qualitative account of the factors that lead workers to file employment discrimination lawsuits based on interviews with plaintiffs in recent high-profile lawsuits; and an analysis of the impact of corporate diversity policies on levels of workplace sex and race inequality and discrimination disputes at work.

Below, Hirsh discusses her multidimensional research interests, the benefits and challenges offered by EEOC data and her upcoming research plans.

How did you become interested in studying employment discrimination?

The field of employment discrimination was an immediate draw for me because it allows for the study of both how inequality is produced and how it can be remedied in social settings.  The production question is complex, as it forces us to consider multiple causal factors, from organizational structure to culture to power and relationships.  The issue of remediation engages classic questions in law and society regarding access to justice and the impact of the law on equality and individual rights.  I’ve long been interested in questions of if and how the law can be equity-enhancing, and the study of employment discrimination provides a context to empirically examine this.  That – and as I bright-eyed new PhD student, my advisor sent me to the law library to dig up details on old discrimination lawsuits.  After getting lost in the stacks for a couple of hours, I was hooked.

You are very active in multiple subfields: organizational sociology, inequality, and law and society. How do you manage your scholarly identity across the boundaries? How do you remain active in different subfields?

Early in my career, I saw myself more as an inequality scholar who focuses on organizational inequities and laws designed to remedy them.  Now I see myself much more as an organizational sociologist who studies inequality and the law.  I’m sure my identity will continue to evolve.  I try to ask and answer questions that are at the nexus of these fields, as these are the questions that most interest me.  How do the empirical findings out of the organizational inequality tradition help us understand the reach and limits of the law?  What can insights from law and society say to those who study workplace inequality?  There is so much overlap in these fields that boundary crossing is easy.  Teaching in each area also keeps me active and (mostly) current in my subfields.

You have used establishment data from the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). What are some advantages and disadvantages (or challenges) of using EEOC data?

The establishment-level data from the EEOC are ideal for studying workplace compositional change over time as they are collected annually and go way back.  But the real promise of the data is in matching them to additional sources.  For instance, together with collaborators, I have matched the establishment level data to EEOC charge data, to litigation data, and to workplace survey data to explore how legal claims and diversity practices affect workplace composition.  When you start matching to additional data sources, the possibilities are endless.

Getting to know these data also opens up opportunities to contribute to policy discussions and practice, since the EEOC data sources are first and foremost a tool for legal compliance.  But therein lies the challenge: they aren’t collected for academic purposes, so you must be prepared for some data drudgery.

What are your research plans for the next 5-10 years?

To finish the many projects I’ve been working on for the last 5-10 years!  I also toy with the idea of bringing my work on discrimination claims and organizational change together in a book, mostly to show my nonacademic friends that we scholars actually do something.  But as an article writer, I’m not sure I have the stamina!

Use the norm of reciprocity to get constructive feedback on your work

By Howard Aldrich

In popular fiction, authors are often portrayed as isolated and tortured souls, locked away in a garret apartment or in a cabin in the forest, producing their great works without benefit of human companionship. In reality, writing is an extremely social activity, highly dependent upon an individual’s network of family and friends. Peer networks play in a particularly important role in moving writing from solipsistic doodling to prose that others want to read. Let me suggest one way in which social relationships are critical: finding people willing to offer critically constructive feedback on the work.

When your draft is completed, how will you know what reception it will receive from the intended readers? When I talk to academic writers about this question, I point out that the most risky action an author can take is to submit to a journal a paper that no one else has yet read. Although it seems incredibly shortsighted, I often talk to people who’ve done exactly that – – they claim that they really couldn’t find anybody they thought would be a good reviewer. Thus, to get feedback on their work, they plunged ahead and sent it out for review.

Continue reading “Use the norm of reciprocity to get constructive feedback on your work”

New Issue of ILR Review. March 2016 Table of Contents

ILR Review

March 2016; Vol. 69, No. 2

Articles

Are the Effects of Minimum Wage Increases Always Small? A Reanalysis of Sabia, Burkhauser, and Hansen

Saul D. Hoffman

In a 2012 article, Sabia, Burkhauser, and Hansen reported very large negative effects of the 2004 to 2006 increase in the New York State minimum wage on the employment of young, less-educated workers. Hoffman reexamines their estimates using data from the full Current Population Survey (CPS), rather than the smaller CPS-MORG files they used, and finds no evidence of a negative employment impact. The full CPS, which is the source of U.S. official labor market statistics, is certainly the more appropriate and reliable data source. Furthermore, when Hoffman repeats the analysis using three states and the District of Columbia, which also had a substantial increase in the state minimum wage in the same time period, he finds evidence of a small positive employment effect. Together, the two findings are consistent with other, more recent research that reports very weak or zero employment effects of the minimum wage.

 

When Good Measurement Goes Wrong: New Evidence That New York State’s Minimum Wage Reduced Employment

Joseph J. Sabia, Richard V. Burkhauser, and Benjamin Hansen

Hoffman’s (2015) replication of Sabia, Burkhauser, and Hansen (SBH 2012) suggests that “unlucky” measurement error in low-skilled employment in the Current Population Survey Outgoing Rotation Groups (CPS-ORG) led SBH to produce upwardly biased estimates of the labor demand effects of the 2005 to 2006 New York State minimum wage increase. This study replicates Hoffman’s preferred policy estimates from the full CPS and finds evidence that the parallel trends assumption underlying his difference-in-difference approach is violated. When a synthetic control state with pretreatment employment trends similar to those in New York is constructed, this study estimates a relatively large negative employment elasticity with respect to the minimum wage for low-skilled individuals (–0.5), similar to the estimate SBH obtained using the CPS-ORG (–0.6).

 

Within- and Cross-Firm Mobility and Earnings Growth

Anders Frederiksen, Timothy Halliday, and Alexander K. Koch

A widely accepted premise is that promotions within firms and mobility across firms lead to significant earnings progression. Existing research generally has examined cross-firm mobility separately from hierarchical advancement. Yet, as the authors’ descriptive evidence from Danish panel data shows, how the two types of mobility interact is important for understanding earnings growth. Cross-firm moves at the nonexecutive level provide sizable short-run earnings growth (similar to the effect of being promoted to an executive position). These gains, however, appear modest compared with the persistent impact on earnings growth of promotions (either within or across firms) and subsequent mobility at a higher hierarchy level.

 

From Pyramids to Diamonds: Legal Process Offshoring, Employment Systems, and Labor Markets for Lawyers in the United States and India

Sarosh Kuruvilla and Ernesto Noronha

In this article, the authors argue that offshoring of legal work from the United States has contributed to the fracturing of the long-established internal labor market arrangements in large U.S. law firms. Drawing on evidence from the United States and India on legal employment, the growth of offshoring, and the rapidly changing nature of work that is offshored, the authors contend that the changes in employment systems in law firms are likely to be permanent, in contrast to other researchers who suggest they are temporary adjustments to the financial crisis. As U.S. law firms are dismantling their internal labor market systems, Indian law firms are partially recreating them.

 

Firm/Employee Matching: An Industry Study of U.S. Lawyers

Paul Oyer and Scott Schaefer

The authors study the sources of match-specific value at large U.S. law firms by analyzing how graduates of law schools group into law firms. They measure the degree to which lawyers from certain schools concentrate within certain firms and then analyze how this agglomeration can be explained by “natural advantage’’ factors (such as geographic proximity) and by productive complementarities across graduates of a given school. Large law firms tend to hire from a select group of law schools, and individual offices within these firms are substantially more concentrated in terms of hires from particular schools. The degree of concentration is highly variable, as there is substantial variation in firms’ hiring strategies. Two main drivers of variation in law school concentration occur within law offices. First, geography drives a large amount of concentration, as most firms hire largely from local schools. Second, school-based networks (and possibly productive complementarities) appear to be important because partners’ law schools drive associates’ law school composition even when controlling for firm, school, and firm/school match characteristics and when instrumenting for partners’ law schools.

 

Did Employers in the United States Back Away from Skills Training during the Early 2000s?

C. Jeffrey Waddoups

A number of recent studies suggest that employer-paid training is on the decline in the United States. The present study provides empirical evidence on the issue by analyzing data on employer-paid training from the Survey of Income and Program Participation, a nationally representative data set. The findings reveal a 28% decline in the incidence of training between 2001 and 2009. Very few industries were immune from the decline, and the pattern was evident across occupation, education, age, job-tenure, and demographic groups. A decomposition of the difference in training incidence reveals a diminishing large-firm training effect. In addition, the workforce appears to have had the educational credentials by 2009 that, had they occurred in 2001, would have led to substantially more training.

 

Intra-firm Wage compression and Coverage of Training Costs: Evidence from Linked Employer-Employee Data

Christian Pfeifer

The author uses German linked employer-employee data to estimate the impact of intra-firm wage dispersion on the probability that establishments pay for further training. About half of all establishments in the estimation sample cover all direct and indirect training costs, which contradicts the standard human capital approach with perfect labor markets. The main finding of cross-section, panel, and instrumental variable probit estimations is that establishments with larger intra-firm wage compression are more likely to cover all direct and indirect training costs, which is consistent with theoretical considerations of the “new training literature” about imperfect labor markets.

 

Social Protection and Labor Market Outcomes of Youth in South Africa

Cally Ardington, Till Bärnighausen, Anne Case, and Alicia Menendez

An Apartheid-driven spatial mismatch between workers and jobs leads to high job search costs for people living in rural areas of South Africa—costs that many young people cannot pay. In this article, the authors examine whether the arrival of a social grant—specifically a generous state-funded old-age pension given to men and women above prime age—enhances the ability of young men in rural areas to seek better work opportunities elsewhere. Based on eight waves of socioeconomic data on household living arrangements and household members’ characteristics and employment status, collected between 2001 and 2011 at a demographic surveillance site in KwaZulu-Natal, the authors find that young men are significantly more likely to become labor migrants when someone in their household becomes age-eligible for the old-age pension. But this effect applies only to those who have completed high school (matric), who are on average 8 percentage points more likely to migrate for work when their households become pension eligible, compared with other potential labor migrants. The authors also find that, upon pension loss, it is the youngest migrants who are the most likely to return to their sending households, perhaps because they are the least likely to be self-sufficient at the time the pension is lost. The evidence is consistent with binding credit constraints limiting young men from poorer households from seeking more lucrative work elsewhere.

 

Private and Public Placement Services for Hard-to-Place Unemployed: Results from a Randomized Field Experiment

Gerhard Krug and Gesine Stephan

The authors analyze a randomized field experiment in two German labor market agencies that provide public and private provision of intensive job placement services. The findings, based on analysis of administrative agency data over 18 months in 2009–2010, show that assignment to public employment services reduced accumulated days in unemployment by one to two months, compared to an assignment to a private provider. The effects, however, were short-lived. Moreover, two-thirds of the effect is attributable to labor force withdrawals. Finally, several important differences in the modes of service provision are only partially attributable to inherent aspects of in-house production and contracting out.

 

Book Reviews

Book Review: Editorial Essay: How Workplace Ethnographies Can Inform the Study of Work and Employment Relations

Michel Anteby and Beth A. Bechky

 

Book Review: Seeing like a Rover: How Robots, Teams, and Images Craft Knowledge of Mars

Stephen R. Barley

 

Book Review: Unknotting the Heart: Unemployment and Therapeutic Governance in China

Ofer Sharone

 

Book Review: All I Want Is a Job! Unemployed Women Navigating the Public Workforce System

Mark Zbaracki

 

Book Review: In the Meantime: Temporality and Cultural Politics

Melissa Mazmanian

 

Book Review: Pedigree: How Elite Students Get Elite Jobs

Curtis K. Chan